tehran_taj/docs/parity/PROGRESS.md

PROGRESS — Reference Parity Project

Read this file FIRST at the start of every session and after every /compact. Rules live in CLAUDE.md (workspace root). Method lives in the reference-parity-audit skill.

Current state

Field	Value
Phase	Security hotfix — stages 1 and 2 ✅ complete
Branch	parity/security-hotfix
Status	Both stages done and verified live: 46/46 smoke assertions, 7/7 jest unit tests, typecheck + build clean on all three projects.
Next step	Show the user the D0 (firstName/lastName) and percent migrations for approval, then start 01-ADMIN-MATRIX.md field-by-field (D12)
Blocked on	user approval of those two migrations before they run
Last updated	2026-09-22

Security hotfix — final result

Route	Was	Now
GET accounting/customers/:id/balance	public	admin, rid wallet.list
POST accounting/customers/:id/reconcile	public write	admin, rid wallet.charge
POST accounting/repayments/gold	public write	admin, rid document.create
POST accounting/repayments/rial	public write	admin, rid document.create
POST accounting/entries/:id/confirm	public write	admin, rid document.list.confirm
PATCH orders/:id/status	public write	admin, rid order.list.sts.submit
GET customers	every customer, 18 fields	route deleted
GET customers/:id	public	route deleted → GET customer/me (token)
GET customers/:id/orders	public	route deleted → GET customer/me/orders (token)
GET customers/:id/ledger-entries	public	route deleted → GET customer/me/ledger-entries (token)
—	—	new POST customer/auth/request-otp · verify-otp

Still public by design: catalog/products, pricing/latest, home/slider, uploads/:filename (ruling T2), and POST /orders + GET /orders/:id — the last two are logged as SEC-02/B1-B2 and want a customer-token pass of their own.

Tests

• apps/api/scripts/auth-smoke.sh (live server): 46 passed, 0 failed. Run it with API=http://localhost:3000/api CODE_LOG=/path/to/api.log.
• pnpm test in apps/api (jest, newly installed): 7 passed.
• Typecheck: api ✅ · user-app ✅ · user-app-v2 ✅. Both apps build ✅.

⚠️ Correction worth remembering

Stage 1 reported the customer-book leak as "mitigated" after narrowing the GET /customers field list. That was wrong: the response still returned every customer id, and the three /customers/:id* routes were still public, so the full data was still two requests away. The user caught it. Stage 2 deleted the whole id-bearing surface instead. Narrowing a response is not closing a leak while the id and the id-addressed routes remain.

⚠️ Read DECISIONS.md before doing anything

All user rulings live there (D0–D13). Highlights that change how work is done:

• D12 — the matrix is FIELD-BY-FIELD, not page-by-page, and a 4-step round-trip test per entity is mandatory. Both rules were added to the reference-parity-audit skill (Step C rule C0, Step E rule E0).
• D0 — split fullName into firstName/lastName via an additive migration; show the migration and get approval before running it.
• D4 — never port broken behaviour, but match calculations/rounding/messages exactly; annotate each non-replication «عمداً تکرار نشد — ISSUE #n».
• D2 — target-only features get status ➕ and are left alone.
• D13 — the retail storefront (48 customer.php + 30 site.php + 31 storefront-management admin routes = 109 of the reference's 412 endpoints) is preserved but out of scope: status ⏸️, no gap row, no work row, nothing deleted or disabled. 288 endpoints stay in scope (218 admin + 70 B2B app). Note: the reference total is 412, not 369 — admin.php was undercounted in Phase 0; corrected in 00-INVENTORY.md §2.1. Ask before changing shared surfaces (product, variant, price, order, customer).

Phase checklist

• P0.1 — All 3 reference folders readable (henza_server, henza_admin, henza_pwa)
• P0.2 — Branch parity/phase-0 + docs/parity/ created
• P0.3 — Inventory all 7 projects → _inv-*.md (8111 lines total) → consolidated in 00-INVENTORY.md
• P0.4 — Mapping tables, missing list, extra list (00-INVENTORY.md §2–4)
• P0.5 — Draft PROTECTED.md
• P0.6 — GATE passed — PROTECTED.md confirmed, D0–D12 recorded
• P0.7 — Urgent traces delivered: percent, @Public list, login leak
• P0.8 — Skill updated with rules C0 (field-by-field) and E0 (round-trip test)
• P1.0 — user approves: 5 ledger routes, percent column, D0 migration ← HERE
• Phase 1 — Admin parity (branch parity/phase-1-admin, 01-ADMIN-MATRIX.md)
• GATE: "Admin parity is complete and tested. Shall we move on to the apps (user-app & user-app-v2)?"
• Phase 2 — Apps parity (02-APPS-MATRIX.md, both user apps)
• Phase 3 — Work through ISSUES.md (only when user asks)

Answered — see DECISIONS.md for the full text

#	Ruling
D0	Split fullName → firstName/lastName, additive migration, backfill, sync, report multi-token rows. Approval needed before running.
D1	Target's stricter auth stands. Build the "reference operation ↔ rid" matrix; explain 172 vs 174.
D2	Audit only what the reference has. Target-only features → ➕, untouched.
D3	Build the 5 missing screens in Phase 2, both apps, plus analytics, isLoaded/sts_verify_step_two guards, guest toast+home, and v2's cart ceiling.
D4	Don't port breakage; do match calculations/rounding/messages. Unit-test the price formula.
D5	Leave the stray folder; delete last, own commit.
D6	OTP must verify — parity gap, fix it (plus expiry + attempt limits, which exceed the reference).
D7	@Public ledger routes: list delivered, awaiting approval to protect.
D8	Login leak: target, full customer book incl. national IDs and debts.
D9	percent: trace delivered — the target's implementation is wrong.
D10	Sales expert: keep AdminUser; investigate the 5 missing fields; propose SalesExpertProfile.
D11	singleCustomer.vue → diff-send.
D12	Field-by-field matrix + mandatory round-trip test. Added to the skill.
D13	Retail storefront (wallet, cashback, ConfigStatic['percent']) preserved but OUT OF SCOPE. Nothing deleted or disabled; no parity work; matrices list it ⏸️ with no gap/work row; ask before touching shared surfaces.

Open — awaiting user approval

1. Protect the 5 @Public ledger-write routes (DECISIONS.md group A).
2. percent schema change — add makingChargeOffsetPercent to Customer.
3. D0 migration file — must be shown and approved before it runs.

Key context (survives context loss)

• Domain correction: the reference is a gold-jewellery B2B/B2C e-commerce system, not a gold bank. No buy/sell order book, no spread, no deposit/withdraw, no P2P transfer, no KYC levels, no daily limits (only gram_level), no payment callback route, no cron, no websockets. See 00-INVENTORY.md §0.
• The gold price formula (Phase 1 row #1) — henza_server/app/Models/ProductVariant.php:183-190: +extra% → +7% margin → +9% VAT on the non-metal portion only → ×grams → floor(/1000)*1000. Three superseded commented-out variants above it apply VAT to the whole price — do not port those.
• A large prior port already happened — see docs/ADMIN-PORT-PLAN.md and docs/CHANGELOG-PORT-HISTORY.md (80 views, 25 Nest modules, 29 Prisma models, 154 admin routes, 144/144 rids). Prior port notes no view was ever visually verified in a browser.
• Stack changed across the port: Laravel→NestJS/Prisma, Vue2/Vuesax→Vue3/antd. Port behaviour, not code style.
• Reference scale is inflated: 541 admin .vue files but only ~69 reachable (rest are Vuexy template demos); 9 reference router files are dead (not imported); ~28 legacy Django-era DB tables have no migrations.
• v1 ⇄ v2 logic gaps (5, all v2 behind v1) are parity work, not design: ISSUES.md MON-01, V2-01..05.

Inventory files (Phase 0 working files)

File	Scope	Lines
_inv-ref-server.md	henza_server	1313
_inv-tgt-api.md	apps/api	1179
_inv-ref-admin.md	henza_admin	1705
_inv-tgt-admin.md	apps/admin-panel	1261
_inv-ref-pwa.md	henza_pwa	1178
_inv-tgt-userapp.md	apps/user-app	612
_inv-tgt-userappv2.md	apps/user-app-v2	700

Consolidated into 00-INVENTORY.md. Issues found: ISSUES.md (26 entries).