Reported by the owner: a number that is not in the system produced no
error at all. The app advanced to the code box and then nothing
happened, and there was no way to tell apart "the SMS is late", "the
gateway is down" and "this number was never registered" — the only one
of the three the person can actually do something about.
Step 1 now says which it is:
- unregistered number -> 404 «این شماره در سیستم ثبت نشده است…»
- SMS send failed -> 503 «ارسال پیام کوتاه … ممکن نیست…»
- sales expert, account unusable -> 403, its own message
and both apps surface the server's Persian message for a 404 exactly as
they already did for a 429. Without that second half the person would
still have seen the generic «خطا در ارسال کد», which is the confusion
being removed.
This restores the reference's behaviour (firstOrFail() in
ApiMobileController::userAuth:43 returns 404); the opaque answer was our
deviation, not this. The anti-enumeration protection it was there for is
deliberately reduced at step 1 on the owner's instruction — the cost was
being paid by real users and by support. Still standing: the per-mobile
and per-IP send throttles, which the reference never had, so enumeration
is rate-bounded rather than free, and verifyOtp keeps one message for
every failure reason. ISSUES.md SEC-03's "no enumeration" claim is
corrected rather than left to go stale.
Two more instances of the same shape turned up while fixing it:
A failed SMS send also returned success, because SmsService never throws
(D20), so a dead gateway produced the identical dead end. D20 exists so
a failed SMS cannot break an operation — an order must still be placed —
but in a login the SMS IS the operation, so it now fails loudly. The
local-dev path keys off SmsService's own `sms-not-configured` result
rather than re-testing the config: with D26's default relay driver,
smsConfigured() is true on any machine with an external IPv4, so a
config test would have called a dev box configured and then failed its
login. The new test caught precisely that on its first run.
Three states return no trading account for a sales expert who does
exist. Under the new 404 each would have claimed the number was not
registered — false, and it would send support hunting a registration
problem that is not there.
Also corrects both apps' LoginView header comment, which still described
this flow as stubbed: no SMS provider, any 4-digit code accepted, step 1
matching the customer list in the client (that was the login leak, D8).
All three had been untrue for weeks and the stale text misled a reader
during this session.
requestOtp had NO test coverage: the 28-test customer-auth suite stayed
green through a change to its response for every unregistered number, so
its greenness was not treated as evidence. request-otp.spec.ts adds 9
cases, including that the dev fallback does not apply in production.
api: 295/295 tests, 27 suites, typecheck clean; both apps vue-tsc clean.
اپ: اگر شماره شما در سیستم ثبت نشده باشد، همان را میگوید و دیگر بیدلیل به صفحه کد نمیرود.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
