Answers D1's 172-vs-174 question with real counts: the catalogues hold 176
(reference) and 174 (target) unique keys, and the ENTIRE difference is the
dashboard. The reference has `dashboard` + `dashboard.omde` + `dashboard.tak`;
the target replaces all three with `dashboard.view`, because the admin
Dashboard is a PROTECTED zone that merged the two reference dashboards.
176 - 3 + 1 = 174. All 173 other keys match exactly, including the same 5
keys that legitimately appear twice in the tree.
Route-guard rids are 57 vs 57, differing only by that dashboard
consolidation plus one target-only route reusing an existing catalogue rid.
All 67 reachable reference admin routes exist in the target at the same
paths; 2 target-only routes are additive.
Three findings logged:
PRICE-01 (critical) — no product price is computed or shown anywhere in the
admin panel. The reference appends price/price_with_discount to every
variant and renders it in three places in its product list; the target's
variantRow() returns neither, nothing fetches a gold rate for the admin
list, and computeVariantPrice() — ported and unit-tested earlier today — is
called from nowhere. This is fix#1.
PERM-01 (medium) — dashboard.omde and dashboard.tak are seeded into the
permission table but absent from the permission UI, so they are grantable
yet unmanageable; the DB holds 178 distinct rids against the UI's 174. The
fix deletes permission rows, so it waits for the owner's approval.
PRICE-02 (info) — rial_pay belongs only to the superseded commented-out
formula; the target correctly omits it. Recorded so it is not "restored".
Contrary to the Phase 0 expectation, the order module is in good shape: the
gram_level credit limit matches the reference exactly including the strict
'>' comparison, and debt recognition fires at the same status.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
