tehran_taj/docs/parity/DECISIONS.md

DECISIONS — user rulings on the parity project

Binding decisions made by the user. They override defaults and survive context loss. Referenced from PROTECTED.md and PROGRESS.md.

Date	Phase	Decisions
2026-09-21	Phase 0 gate	D0–D5, D6–D8 (urgent), D9–D11, D12 (method change)

---

D0 — First name / last name: split the column (option الف)

Ruling. Add real firstName / lastName columns to Customer via an additive migration.

Requirements:

1. Additive migration only — nothing dropped.
2. Backfill existing rows: first token of fullName → firstName, the rest → lastName.
3. Rows whose fullName has more than two tokens must be written to a report for manual review (they cannot be split safely).
4. fullName is NOT removed. It stays and is kept in sync as firstName + " " + lastName so existing code keeps working.
5. toRow() must return the real fname / lname, not fullName / ''.
6. Fix every consumer: singleCustomer.vue, bulkCustomer.vue, ReagentCustomer.vue, and anywhere a name is displayed, searched or sorted. Remove the split(' ') fallback in singleCustomer.vue.
7. Check the same defect on AdminUser (sales expert) and on registration / profile in user-app and user-app-v2.
8. Show the migration file and the command, and get approval, before running it.

Evidence for the defect: reference has two columns (henza_server/database/migrations/2020_10_01_120430_customers_table.php:18-19); target collapses them (apps/api/src/modules/admin-customers/admin-customers.service.ts:231-233 returns fname: c.fullName, lname: '').

D1 — Admin auth: keep the target stricter

The reference leaves all ~215 admin routes unauthenticated (henza_server/routes/admin.php:12,272). The target's JWT + 144-rid enforcement stands, recorded as an accepted deviation.

Additional requirement: build a complete mapping matrix "every reference admin operation ↔ its permission key (rid) in the target", so no operation is left without an equivalent permission. Explain the 172 (reference) vs 174 (target) unique key difference.

D2 — Domain scope: audit only what the reference has

Confirmed. Do not manufacture rows for buy/sell gold, deposit, withdraw, transfer, KYC levels, price sockets or payment callbacks — none exist in the reference (00-INVENTORY.md §0).

Target-only capabilities (e.g. the dual-currency ledger, gram/rial debt) are listed with status ➕ and left untouched. Ask when unsure.

D3 — The 5 missing user-app screens: build them in Phase 2

/report, /report/detail, /ChildOrder, /customerChoice, /complete_profile are built in both apps, each in its own design language, plus whatever backend they need.

Also brought to reference behaviour in Phase 2:

• route analytics (POST /log/create/{key}, GET /log/update/{id})
• the isLoaded guard
• the sts_verify_step_two guard on completeProfile
• guest behaviour: toast «ابتدا وارد شوید» + redirect to home (not a redirect to /login)
• v2's missing cart stock ceiling (capQty/maxQty) must match v1 and the reference

D4 — Reference bugs: replicate behaviour, not breakage

• Broken or destructive reference behaviour is not ported — logged only.
• Business behaviour, calculations, rounding and messages must match the reference exactly.
• Every deliberate non-replication gets a matrix note: «عمداً تکرار نشد — ISSUE #n».
• The price formula is the live version at henza_server/app/Models/ProductVariant.php:183-190 — not the commented-out ones above it.
• Write a unit test for it with sample numbers and compare against the reference formula computed by hand.

D5 — Stray root folder: leave it for now

gold-banking-monorepo/user-app-v2/ is logged in ISSUES.md (DEAD-03). At the very end, after verifying nothing references it, delete it in its own commit.

---

D6 — URGENT: OTP must be verified (exception to "log only", per CLAUDE.md §3)

The reference does verify the OTP, so the target accepting any code is a parity gap, not just a security issue. Fix it to match the reference: code matching, expiry, and attempt limits.

Reference implementation (henza_server/app/Http/Controllers/Api/ApiMobileController.php:39-78):

Step	Reference behaviour	Line
Send	userAuth validates username, finds an active customer by mobile, generates rand(1000,9999), stores it in customer.send_password, sends it by SMS	:39-49
Verify	userVerfiy validates username + password; if faTOen(password) != customer.send_password → HTTP 422	:51-57
Token	issues api_token = Str::random(60) only if the customer doesn't already have one	:60-62
Digits	the code is normalised through Utility::faTOen() (Persian → English digits) on both send and verify	:42,56

⚠️ Note for the matrix: the reference has no expiry and no attempt limit — send_password is a plain column that stays valid indefinitely. D6 asks for expiry and attempt limits, which go beyond the reference. Recorded as a deliberate, user-requested improvement; the parity row is the code match itself.

D7 — URGENT: @Public() routes that write to the ledger

Show the exact list with file paths and what the reference did for each, then protect them after user approval. See §"@Public audit" below.

D8 — URGENT: the login customer-list leak

Identify whether it is reference or target, and what data leaks. See §"Login leak" below.

---

D9 — percent: trace before acting

Done — see 00-INVENTORY.md and the trace summary delivered to the user. Key finding: the target's implementation is wrong. percent is a real column on the customer in the reference, not a derived value from the referring agent.

D10 — Sales expert: the 5 missing fields

The move to AdminUser is accepted. For ncode, phone, city_id, gram_level, reagent_id: find where the reference uses each for type=1 (list, filter, report, order, calculation). Fields that are genuinely used must be added — proposed shape: a SalesExpertProfile table related to AdminUser. Fields with no use are listed for the user to decide.

D11 — singleCustomer.vue: migrate to the diff-send pattern

Bring it in line with bulkCustomer.vue and ReagentCustomer.vue. Diff-send is recorded as an accepted deviation from the reference (which sends every field on every save).

---

D12 — METHOD CHANGE for Phase 1 (and Phase 2)

1. The matrix is field-by-field, not page-by-page. Every form field (name, type, required, validation, message, default), every table column, every filter, every button — and for each one, the client field name ↔ API field name ↔ DB column, on both sides.

2. A round-trip test is mandatory per entity:

create with every field populated
  → open the edit form, assert every field is correctly populated
  → save with no changes, assert the DB row is byte-identical
  → change exactly one field, assert only that field changed

Run it for the sales expert too.

3. Both rules are to be added to the reference-parity-audit skill (Step C and Step E) so Phase 2 inherits them.

---

Urgent investigation results

percent — full trace (D9)

In the reference, percent is a real column on the customer

Fact	Evidence
Column exists on customers	database/migrations/2020_10_19_153228_customer_add.php:32 — $table->double('percent')->default(0);
Mass-assignable	app/Models/Customer.php:31
Defaulted to 3 for app-registered customers	app/Http/Controllers/Adm/AdminController.php:338 — $input['percent'] = 3;
Required when an admin creates a wholesale customer	AdminController.php:354 — 'percent'=>'required'
Selected into the wholesale customer list	Adm/MajorCustomerController.php:36
Shown in a report column «درصد»	Adm/ReportController.php:137

What it actually does — it shifts the customer's making-charge filter

app/Http/Controllers/Api/ApiMobileController.php:391-396:

if (sizeof($limit_percent) > 0 and auth('api-customer')->check()) {
    $limit_percent[0] = $limit_percent[0] - auth('api-customer')->user()->percent;
    $limit_percent[1] = $limit_percent[1] - auth('api-customer')->user()->percent;
    $product->whereHas('variants', fn($q) => $q->whereBetween('percentage_pay', $limit_percent));
}

And it shifts the filter bounds the app is told to display, at login (ApiMobileController.php:76-77):

$customer['filterPercentPay'][] = strval(ProductVariant::min('percentage_pay') + $customer['percent']);
$customer['filterPercentPay'][] = strval(ProductVariant::max('percentage_pay') + $customer['percent']);

So customer.percent is a per-customer making-charge offset: the UI shows percentage_pay + percent, and the filter subtracts it again before querying.

What it does NOT do

It is not part of the price formula. The formula's extra percent comes from a global config row, not from the customer:

• app/Models/ProductVariant.php:50 — ConfigStatic::where('key','product_price_extra_percent')->first()['val'] ?? 7
• app/Models/ProductVariant.php:183 — ($this->percentage_pay + static::$product_price_extra_percent)

There is a separate, unrelated ConfigStatic key also called percent, used for the cashback/wallet rule (AdminController.php:903,994; Controller.php:203) — value = total_weight * (percent/100). Do not confuse the two.

A third unrelated percent is a per-order-item field in wholesale orders (Adm/MajorOrderController.php:220): w = rash_weight + rash_weight * (percent/100). That one comes from the request, not from the customer.

The target is wrong

apps/api/src/modules/admin-customers/admin-customers.service.ts:245:

// legacy `percent` came from the referring agent's commission rate
percent: c.referredByAgent?.wagePercent ?? null,

That comment is incorrect — the reference reads customer.percent, its own column. Consequences:

1. Read is wrong — it shows the agent's commission, not the customer's offset.
2. Write is missing — update() never handles data.percent (admin-customers.service.ts:600-658), so editing the field in the admin form does nothing.
3. The create default is missing — the reference sets percent = 3 for app-registered customers and requires it for admin-created wholesale customers.
4. The app-side effect is missing — no filterPercentPay offset anywhere in user-app / user-app-v2.

Proposed reconstruction (needs user approval — it is a schema change)

1. Add makingChargeOffsetPercent Decimal @default(0) to Customer (additive migration). Name it clearly so it is never confused with the two other percents; map it to the legacy key percent in toRow().
2. toRow() returns that column, not referredByAgent.wagePercent. Remove the incorrect comment.
3. create(): default 3 on the app-registration path; require it on the admin wholesale path (reference AdminController.php:354).
4. update(): handle data.percent.
5. Catalogue filter: subtract the customer's offset from the percentage_pay bounds before querying, and return shifted filterPercentPay bounds at login — matching ApiMobileController.php:391-396,76-77.
6. The referring agent's wagePercent stays where it belongs (the agent), and is not exposed through the customer form.

---

@Public() audit (D7) — every unauthenticated route in the target

15 routes across 7 controllers. Verified by reading each controller.

🔴 Group A — ledger writes (the ones the user flagged)

apps/api/src/modules/accounting/accounting.controller.ts — @Public() on the whole controller (:7), prefix accounting (:8):

#	Route	Line	Effect	Reference equivalent
A1	GET accounting/customers/:customerId/balance	:12	reads any customer's balance	Adm/WalletController — reference had auth commented out too (routes/admin.php:12)
A2	POST accounting/customers/:customerId/reconcile	:17	writes — reconciles a balance	same: unauthenticated in reference
A3	POST accounting/repayments/gold	:22	writes — records a gold repayment	same
A4	POST accounting/repayments/rial	:27	writes — records a rial repayment	same
A5	POST accounting/entries/:entryId/confirm	:32	writes — confirms a ledger entry	same

In the reference these were admin routes in routes/admin.php, and that whole file's auth:api wrapper is commented out — so they were unauthenticated there too. The target faithfully reproduced that. Under D1 the target is supposed to be stricter, so these five are the clearest violation of D1 still standing.

Recommendation: A1–A5 are admin operations. Put them behind the admin JWT guard with the matching rid (the wallet/document rids from acl.constants.ts). Awaiting your approval — this is the list you asked for.

🟠 Group B — order writes

apps/api/src/modules/orders/orders.controller.ts — @Public() at :7, prefix orders:

#	Route	Line	Note	Reference
B1	POST orders	:12	customer places an order	ApiMobileController::setOrder — was authenticated via auth('api-customer'); it reads auth()->id() at :533
B2	GET orders/:id	:17	reads any order by id	same guard in reference
B3	PATCH orders/:id/status	:22	changes order status; DTO accepts a client-supplied actorAdminUserId	admin operation in reference

B1/B2 differ from the reference in kind: the reference's customer endpoints sat behind the api-customer guard and derived the customer from the token. The target has no customer session at all, so it takes customerId from the request body. That is why they are public. Fixing this properly means building customer auth — which is exactly what D6 starts.

B3 is the worst of the three: it lets an anonymous caller move an order's status and attribute the action to any admin.

🟢 Group C — genuinely public reads (match the reference's public storefront)

#	Route	File:line	Reference
C1	GET customers	customers/customers.controller.ts:10	see the leak below
C2	GET customers/:id	:15	—
C3	GET customers/:id/orders	:20	—
C4	GET customers/:id/ledger-entries	:25	—
C5	GET catalog/products	catalog/catalog.controller.ts:10	reference storefront was public (routes/site.php) ✅
C6	GET pricing/latest	pricing/pricing.controller.ts:10	reference /price was public ✅
C7	GET home/slider	admin-misc/public-slider.controller.ts:21	reference mobile_main_slider config, public ✅
C8	GET uploads/:filename	admin-uploads/public-uploads.controller.ts:17	reference served uploads statically ✅

C5–C8 are legitimately public. C1–C4 are not — they expose customer records.

---

Login leak (D8) — it is in the target, and it is worse than "a list"

Where: target only. apps/user-app and apps/user-app-v2 both call GET /api/customers at login and match the phone number in the browser.

What leaks: GET /customers is @Public() (customers/customers.controller.ts:10) and returns every active, non-archived customer with these fields (customers/customers.service.ts:6-23, :44-50):

Field	Sensitive?
id, createdAt, updatedAt	low
fullName	🔴 PII
mobile	🔴 PII
nationalCode	🔴 national ID number
cityId, referredByAgentId	medium
goldCreditLimitGrams, goldDebtGrams, fiatDebtRial	🔴 financial position of every customer
verificationStep, isActive, isArchived	medium
nationalIdImageUrl, businessLicenseUrl, shopImageUrl	🔴 URLs of ID-document scans

passwordHash is correctly excluded — the select list is explicit and the source comment says so (customers.service.ts:5). So no password material leaks.

Everything else does. Any anonymous visitor can fetch the full customer book — names, mobiles, national ID numbers, debts, and links to identity-document images (and GET uploads/:filename is public too, so those links resolve).

In the reference this was not possible. Login was POST userAuth → SMS code → POST userVerfiy (ApiMobileController.php:39-78): the server looked the customer up by mobile and returned only that one customer after the code matched. There was no "download everyone and match on the client" step.

Root cause: the target has no customer authentication, so the client does the lookup. D6 (real OTP) is the fix for both problems at once — once POST auth/otp/verify returns the authenticated customer, GET /customers can be taken off the public surface entirely.