The owner ruled that the reference also ran a retail storefront (B2C
single-customer shop) and that the wallet, cashback and
ConfigStatic['percent'] belong to it. These are preserved exactly as they
are: nothing deleted or disabled on either side, no parity work, listed in
the matrices with status "preserved — out of current scope" and no gap or
work row. Shared surfaces (product, variant, price, order, customer) need
the owner's approval before a change that could reach the storefront.
Classifying the endpoints for that split surfaced a counting error in the
Phase 0 inventory: routes/admin.php has 151 live explicit routes, not the
117 recorded, so the reference total is 412 and not 369 (logged DOC-01).
get-analytics-tak reads SingleCustomerOrders, so it is a storefront route
despite its neutral name (logged DOC-02).
Of the 412 reference endpoints, 109 are retail storefront, 15 are web.php
dev/ops closures, and 288 remain in scope (218 admin + 70 B2B app).
[ref: henza_server/routes/{admin,api,customer,site,web}.php]
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Phase 0 gate passed. All rulings recorded in docs/parity/DECISIONS.md and
applied to PROTECTED.md, PROGRESS.md and ISSUES.md. No source code changed.
Urgent investigations requested by the user, all evidence-cited:
- percent trace: the target's implementation is WRONG. `percent` is the
customer's OWN column in the reference (customer_add.php:32), a per-customer
making-charge offset used to shift catalogue filter bounds
(ApiMobileController.php:391-396,76-77). The target reads the referring
agent's wagePercent instead (admin-customers.service.ts:245) and never
writes the field at all. It is NOT part of the price formula -- that extra
percent comes from a global ConfigStatic row (ProductVariant.php:50,183).
Two unrelated `percent` keys exist and must not be confused with it.
- @Public audit: 15 routes across 7 controllers, grouped by risk. Group A is
5 ledger routes (4 writes) that contradict decision D1; group B is 3 order
routes incl. a public status change accepting a client-supplied
actorAdminUserId; group C is 8 reads, of which only the catalogue, pricing,
slider and uploads are legitimately public.
- Login leak: it is in the TARGET. GET /customers is public and returns every
active customer with national ID numbers, debts and ID-document URLs.
passwordHash is correctly excluded. Not possible in the reference.
Also logged 5 customer-module defects found in the deep check the user asked
for (CUST-01..05), including the fullName collapse the user reported.
Skill updated per D12: Step C gains rule C0 (field-by-field matrix, never
page-by-page) and Step E gains rule E0 (mandatory 4-step round-trip test).
[ref: henza_server, henza_admin]
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Read-only inventory of all 7 projects (3 reference + 4 target) produced by
parallel subagents, every claim cited path:line. No source code changed.
- 00-INVENTORY.md consolidated mapping: stack, backend, admin, user apps
- PROTECTED.md draft protected list (awaiting user confirmation)
- ISSUES.md 26 logged issues (security, money/stock, validation, dead code)
- CHANGELOG.md change log scaffold
- PROGRESS.md resumable state + Q1-Q5 blocking Phase 1
- _inv-*.md 7 raw per-project inventories (8111 lines)
Key finding: the reference is a gold-jewellery B2B/B2C e-commerce system, not a
gold bank. Buy/sell, deposit/withdraw, transfer, KYC levels, payment callbacks,
cron and websockets do not exist in it, so they cannot be parity gaps.
[ref: henza_server, henza_admin, henza_pwa]
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
