Reported missing by the owner: in the reference an expert could open any
of their referred customers and use the app AS them — browse, see
balance and debt, place orders — «یکجورایی انگار با اکانت اون ها لاگین
کرده». D21 had deliberately left it out as a session-hijack primitive.
The owner asked for the capability back with the implementation left to
judgement, so the scope is the reference's and the mechanism is not.
Scope: everything, as the reference had it. Its axios interceptor
swapped the bearer token, so every request went as the customer,
document upload included. No route is closed in act-as mode.
Mechanism: the reference minted and handed over the customer's own
permanent api_token. Here the expert keeps their own token and sends
X-Act-As-Customer, resolved in one place — CustomerJwtStrategy
.validateExpert. That single point is why all 17 customer routes work
unchanged: validate() already returns a principal whose `id` is a
Customer id and every customer route reads it. It also fixes four real
defects of the original:
- ownership is re-checked on EVERY request, with referredByAgentId in
the same where clause as the id, so another expert's customer and a
non-existent id both answer 403, and a customer moved to another
expert loses access at once rather than at token expiry;
- nothing durable is handed out — the reference's token sat in
localStorage with no expiry and kept working after the expert left;
- adminUserId survives, so an order placed this way is attributable;
in the reference the request was literally the customer's;
- 403 rather than 401, so the app clears the act-as state instead of
logging a perfectly valid session out.
Performance: one findFirst on the primary key, only when the header is
present, and it replaces the trading-account lookup rather than adding
to it.
Three things the reference never needed, because it swapped the whole
session. queryCache's `me:` keys, favouritesStore and wageQuoteStore all
dropped their data on a TOKEN change, which act-as does not cause — so
an expert would have seen their own profile, orders, balance, ledger and
favourites inside the customer's account. The wage-quote one is the
money case: making charge is per customer, so the figure on screen would
not have been the one the order was priced at. And uploadDocument builds
its own headers, so an expert's upload would have been filed against
their own account, silently.
Added with no reference equivalent: a permanent «در حال مشاهده بهعنوان
…» bar. There, impersonation was invisible once the token had been
swapped, and placing an order on the wrong customer's gold debt was one
tap away. It is also the exit — the reference's only way out was a
logout that ended the expert's own session too. The cart is cleared in
both directions.
CustomerJwtStrategy had no test coverage at all and is now where this
feature's whole authorisation boundary lives: act-as-customer.spec.ts
covers 11 cases, including the header being ignored on a customer token,
the no-header path asserting the extra query does not run, and a revoked
session short-circuiting before the header is read.
api: 308/308 tests, 28 suites; both apps vue-tsc clean.
اپ: کارشناس فروش میتواند وارد حساب مشتریان خود شود، وضعیتشان را ببیند و از طرفشان سفارش ثبت کند.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Step 2 of the owner's MON-08 ruling. An app order is priced by the server
(steps 1, 3, 4 landed with the wage-formula work), but the client's own
wagePercent, discountPercent and flatRialCharge were being thrown away in
silence — so a stale app build, a promotion that expired between the
product page and checkout, and a deliberately tampered request were
indistinguishable and left no trace anywhere.
They are now logged with both numbers, the same pattern already used for
the body's customerId. The pricing itself is untouched: the server's
figures are what the order is charged, and an operator ordering from the
panel still keeps the numbers they typed.
Also adds the comparison test the ruling asked for, which step 3 never
actually had — the suite only proved a tampered request gets overridden.
The new test places one honest order as a customer and the same order as
an operator and asserts the totals are identical, which is the real
claim: an ordinary customer's total does not move. Two more cover the
logging, including that an honest order logs nothing — so the quiet case
cannot pass merely because the method never ran.
Closes STUB-05 in the docs as well: the reference's six hardcoded staff
numbers have been behind PROFILE_ADMIN_MOBILES / ORDER_ADMIN_MOBILES for
a while, but its status still read "pending".
api: 286/286 tests, 26 suites, typecheck clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The reference texted three audiences on every placed order
(henza_server Api/ApiMobileController::setOrder:733-766). None of it was
wired here — OrdersService had no SmsService at all, so a customer could
place an order and nobody was told: not the customer, not the admins, not
the referring sales expert.
Now, after the transaction commits (so a rolled-back order texts nobody)
and without ever being awaited (D20 — a dead gateway must not fail an
order):
- every mobile in ORDER_ADMIN_MOBILES, with the customer's name and
the rounded gold weight;
- the customer, with distinct text for a normal and an over-limit
suspended order;
- the referring sales expert, looked up on AdminUser (the target's
referring expert is an admin, not a customer as in the reference).
The reference's four hardcoded personal numbers stay out of git, behind
the same env-var pattern as PROFILE_ADMIN_MOBILES.
The «در سیستم ویرایش شد» variant was deliberately not ported: the target
has no order-edit route, so it would be dead code — «عمداً تکرار نشد».
Also fills §2 of the admin matrix, the D1 deliverable that had been
(pending) since the phase opened: 163 rid-guarded routes, 68 distinct
rids, 176 grantable tree keys, and a per-module map to the reference
controllers. Only two enforced rids are ungrantable from the permission
screen (newsletters, persons.list.sellers.view) — filed as PERM-02,
awaiting an owner ruling because it changes the permission vocabulary.
Phase 1 (admin parity) is at its gate. api: 283/283 tests, 26 suites.
پنل: پیامک ثبت سفارش برای مشتری، ادمینها و کارشناس فروش فعال شد.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Legacy: final % = variant % + customer % − the largest active promotion
on the product, its category or its brand; rial charge 0. The apps sent
the variant's own % only, so the new app undercharged by the customer's
percent (usually 3) and ignored promotions, and the server trusted
whatever the app sent.
- pricing/wage-formula.ts: one formula, legacy by default, with
coefficients, promotion pick, constant, floor/cap and rounding so the
admin screen can change it; validated
- an app order is priced by it; the app's wage, discount and rial charge
are ignored; an operator's manual numbers are kept
- POST customer/me/wage-quote; both apps show that figure
- admin/pricing/wage-formula (config.wage): read, preview, approve with
the sample it was checked on, last 20 versions kept; the setting is
kept off the generic const routes
Owner approval: 2026-10-08.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Legacy stored customers.sts but no code read it, so the switch never
stopped an order, and 313 active customers carry it, mostly as the
sign-up default. Owner option 2: enforce it from now on, for orders
placed from the app only (an operator can still order for the
customer), and import every customer as allowed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Legacy never posted order debt; updateRemain recomputed it as
SUM(orders.input) WHERE sts > 4. The port posted it once on entering
DELIVERED_TO_AGENT, guarded on deliveredAt, which:
- posted it twice when an order reached that status again
- posted nothing for an order sent straight to DELIVERED_TO_CUSTOMER
- kept it after a rollback or cancellation
syncOrderDebt compares what the order should owe with the confirmed
ORDER_STOCK entries on it and posts only the difference (append-only,
idempotent). Status removal runs it too, so removing «تحویل به نماینده»
is allowed again, as in legacy. Existing data: 0 orders out of line.
Owner approval: 2026-10-08.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Legacy fixed `orders.reagent_id` once, when the order was placed, and its
«میزان فروش» summed `customer_id = X OR reagent_id = X`. The app credited
orders to the customer's CURRENT referrer and left out an expert's own
orders, so 9 of 49 imported experts showed a different figure.
- Order.salesAgentId (+ referrerCustomerId for 17 legacy orders whose
referrer was not an expert); additive migration, recent app orders
backfilled from the customer's referrer
- createOrder records the expert at placement time
- one shared filter (agent-orders.ts) for the experts list, expert
detail, dashboard and the expert app; child orders follow salesAgentId
- customer page gets its «میزان فروش» back
- import carries orders.reagent_id as is; ex-experts kept as admins keep
their profile so their own orders stay linked
- reconcile-sales: 1,557 of 1,558 match legacy's own formula; balances
unchanged
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The user declined to defer this to Phase 2, correctly: a public POST /orders
with customerId in the body let anyone place an order on any customer's
account, and an order lands on that customer's gold debt and ledger.
POST /orders is now behind CustomerAuth. OrdersService.createOrder takes the
customer id as a separate argument that the controller fills from the token;
the body's customerId is ignored and a mismatch is logged. The field stays
optional in the DTO and in shared-types only so both apps keep validating
while they still send it -- they drop it in Phase 2. The admin builder is
unaffected: it legitimately places orders for a chosen customer and passes
that id explicitly, behind the admin guard.
GET /orders/:id is scoped to the owner. A foreign or nonexistent id both
return 404, never 403, so ids stay unenumerable. Operators read through the
new GET /orders/admin/:id behind rid order.list, declared before the :id
route because Nest matches in declaration order.
Both apps' CartView now gates on session.isLoggedIn rather than a remembered
customerId, which is no longer a credential.
OTP audit (requested): no master code, no bypass, no hardcoded code anywhere;
one code path issues a token and only after bcrypt.compare. No SMS provider is
wired up -- in development the code is logged once, guarded by
NODE_ENV !== 'production'.
Fixed while auditing (SEC-11): deliver() persisted the real message text, code
included, into SmsMessage.body, which the admin SMS grid lists and full-text
searches. Any operator with the sms rid could read live codes, defeating the
hashing of codeHash. The stored row is now a redacted audit line.
Also logged MON-08: wagePercent/discountPercent/flatRialCharge are still taken
from the client on order creation. The reference is worse -- it takes
rash_weight from the client too -- so this is already a partial improvement;
logged rather than changed, per D4.
Tests: auth-smoke.sh now 53 passed, 0 failed, including a spoofed body
customerId being ignored in favour of the token. Typecheck clean on api,
user-app, user-app-v2 and shared-types.
[ref: henza_server ApiMobileController.php:533,536-545,615-632]
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
