Commit Graph
9 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
mahmoodandCursor 520454481b Remove user-app v1 and ship pending order, auth, and app fixes.
Drop the duplicate customer app from the monorepo and keep user-app-v2 as the only app; include order pricing, admin cart, OTP/SMS, and dashboard cache updates.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-10-28 16:22:32 +03:30
s.esmaeiliandCursor afb068c643 feat: paginate customer orders and polish the dashboard hero
Add paged orders API and infinite scroll, short order numbers, and align the guest invite card with the logged-in hero shell.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-10-17 13:11:42 +03:30
s.esmaeiliandClaude Haiku 5.5 532ceee189 feat: move brand name to one config and redesign the accounting card
اپ: نام برند در همه‌ی صفحه‌ها و پیام‌ها یکسان شده و از یک تنظیم مرکزی خوانده می‌شود.
اپ: کارت حسابداری در صفحه‌ی مشتری بازطراحی شد؛ مانده‌ها و وضعیت لینک واضح‌تر نمایش داده می‌شوند.
پنل: کارت حسابداری در پرونده‌ی مشتری بازطراحی شد؛ مانده‌ها، آخرین ارسال و فرم لینک دستی واضح‌تر شده‌اند.
پنل: ستون «کد» در جدول‌ها به‌طور پیش‌فرض پنهان است و از انتخاب ستون‌ها قابل نمایش است.
پنل: تغییر نمایش ستون‌ها در جدول‌ها بلافاصله اعمال می‌شود.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-14 13:31:20 +03:30
s.esmaeiliandClaude Opus 5 ddcc8c5649 feat(apps): a sales expert can work inside their customer's account (D29)
Reported missing by the owner: in the reference an expert could open any
of their referred customers and use the app AS them — browse, see
balance and debt, place orders — «یکجورایی انگار با اکانت اون ها لاگین
کرده». D21 had deliberately left it out as a session-hijack primitive.
The owner asked for the capability back with the implementation left to
judgement, so the scope is the reference's and the mechanism is not.

Scope: everything, as the reference had it. Its axios interceptor
swapped the bearer token, so every request went as the customer,
document upload included. No route is closed in act-as mode.

Mechanism: the reference minted and handed over the customer's own
permanent api_token. Here the expert keeps their own token and sends
X-Act-As-Customer, resolved in one place — CustomerJwtStrategy
.validateExpert. That single point is why all 17 customer routes work
unchanged: validate() already returns a principal whose `id` is a
Customer id and every customer route reads it. It also fixes four real
defects of the original:

  - ownership is re-checked on EVERY request, with referredByAgentId in
    the same where clause as the id, so another expert's customer and a
    non-existent id both answer 403, and a customer moved to another
    expert loses access at once rather than at token expiry;
  - nothing durable is handed out — the reference's token sat in
    localStorage with no expiry and kept working after the expert left;
  - adminUserId survives, so an order placed this way is attributable;
    in the reference the request was literally the customer's;
  - 403 rather than 401, so the app clears the act-as state instead of
    logging a perfectly valid session out.

Performance: one findFirst on the primary key, only when the header is
present, and it replaces the trading-account lookup rather than adding
to it.

Three things the reference never needed, because it swapped the whole
session. queryCache's `me:` keys, favouritesStore and wageQuoteStore all
dropped their data on a TOKEN change, which act-as does not cause — so
an expert would have seen their own profile, orders, balance, ledger and
favourites inside the customer's account. The wage-quote one is the
money case: making charge is per customer, so the figure on screen would
not have been the one the order was priced at. And uploadDocument builds
its own headers, so an expert's upload would have been filed against
their own account, silently.

Added with no reference equivalent: a permanent «در حال مشاهده به‌عنوان
…» bar. There, impersonation was invisible once the token had been
swapped, and placing an order on the wrong customer's gold debt was one
tap away. It is also the exit — the reference's only way out was a
logout that ended the expert's own session too. The cart is cleared in
both directions.

CustomerJwtStrategy had no test coverage at all and is now where this
feature's whole authorisation boundary lives: act-as-customer.spec.ts
covers 11 cases, including the header being ignored on a customer token,
the no-header path asserting the extra query does not run, and a revoked
session short-circuiting before the header is read.

api: 308/308 tests, 28 suites; both apps vue-tsc clean.

اپ: کارشناس فروش می‌تواند وارد حساب مشتریان خود شود، وضعیتشان را ببیند و از طرفشان سفارش ثبت کند.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 11:48:59 +03:30
s.esmaeiliandClaude Opus 5 fd9191eca8 feat(orders): log the client price figures the server discards (MON-08)
Step 2 of the owner's MON-08 ruling. An app order is priced by the server
(steps 1, 3, 4 landed with the wage-formula work), but the client's own
wagePercent, discountPercent and flatRialCharge were being thrown away in
silence — so a stale app build, a promotion that expired between the
product page and checkout, and a deliberately tampered request were
indistinguishable and left no trace anywhere.

They are now logged with both numbers, the same pattern already used for
the body's customerId. The pricing itself is untouched: the server's
figures are what the order is charged, and an operator ordering from the
panel still keeps the numbers they typed.

Also adds the comparison test the ruling asked for, which step 3 never
actually had — the suite only proved a tampered request gets overridden.
The new test places one honest order as a customer and the same order as
an operator and asserts the totals are identical, which is the real
claim: an ordinary customer's total does not move. Two more cover the
logging, including that an honest order logs nothing — so the quiet case
cannot pass merely because the method never ran.

Closes STUB-05 in the docs as well: the reference's six hardcoded staff
numbers have been behind PROFILE_ADMIN_MOBILES / ORDER_ADMIN_MOBILES for
a while, but its status still read "pending".

api: 286/286 tests, 26 suites, typecheck clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 10:29:13 +03:30
s.esmaeiliandClaude Opus 5 83e5d2868b feat(orders): send the order-placement SMS and close Phase 1
The reference texted three audiences on every placed order
(henza_server Api/ApiMobileController::setOrder:733-766). None of it was
wired here — OrdersService had no SmsService at all, so a customer could
place an order and nobody was told: not the customer, not the admins, not
the referring sales expert.

Now, after the transaction commits (so a rolled-back order texts nobody)
and without ever being awaited (D20 — a dead gateway must not fail an
order):
  - every mobile in ORDER_ADMIN_MOBILES, with the customer's name and
    the rounded gold weight;
  - the customer, with distinct text for a normal and an over-limit
    suspended order;
  - the referring sales expert, looked up on AdminUser (the target's
    referring expert is an admin, not a customer as in the reference).

The reference's four hardcoded personal numbers stay out of git, behind
the same env-var pattern as PROFILE_ADMIN_MOBILES.

The «در سیستم ویرایش شد» variant was deliberately not ported: the target
has no order-edit route, so it would be dead code — «عمداً تکرار نشد».

Also fills §2 of the admin matrix, the D1 deliverable that had been
(pending) since the phase opened: 163 rid-guarded routes, 68 distinct
rids, 176 grantable tree keys, and a per-module map to the reference
controllers. Only two enforced rids are ungrantable from the permission
screen (newsletters, persons.list.sellers.view) — filed as PERM-02,
awaiting an owner ruling because it changes the permission vocabulary.

Phase 1 (admin parity) is at its gate. api: 283/283 tests, 26 suites.

پنل: پیامک ثبت سفارش برای مشتری، ادمین‌ها و کارشناس فروش فعال شد.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 10:24:46 +03:30
s.esmaeiliandClaude Opus 5.5 699657e483 feat(pricing): the server prices app orders with legacy's making-charge formula (MON-08)
Legacy: final % = variant % + customer % − the largest active promotion
on the product, its category or its brand; rial charge 0. The apps sent
the variant's own % only, so the new app undercharged by the customer's
percent (usually 3) and ignored promotions, and the server trusted
whatever the app sent.

- pricing/wage-formula.ts: one formula, legacy by default, with
  coefficients, promotion pick, constant, floor/cap and rounding so the
  admin screen can change it; validated
- an app order is priced by it; the app's wage, discount and rial charge
  are ignored; an operator's manual numbers are kept
- POST customer/me/wage-quote; both apps show that figure
- admin/pricing/wage-formula (config.wage): read, preview, approve with
  the sample it was checked on, last 20 versions kept; the setting is
  kept off the generic const routes

Owner approval: 2026-10-08.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 11:26:55 +03:30
s.esmaeiliandClaude Opus 5.5 4b7b2473fc feat(orders): «عدم سفارش» blocks app orders; import starts everyone allowed (MON-05)
Legacy stored customers.sts but no code read it, so the switch never
stopped an order, and 313 active customers carry it, mostly as the
sign-up default. Owner option 2: enforce it from now on, for orders
placed from the app only (an operator can still order for the
customer), and import every customer as allowed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 11:16:29 +03:30
s.esmaeiliandClaude Opus 5.5 29084904e9 feat(orders): credit each order to the expert who placed it, as legacy did
Legacy fixed `orders.reagent_id` once, when the order was placed, and its
«میزان فروش» summed `customer_id = X OR reagent_id = X`. The app credited
orders to the customer's CURRENT referrer and left out an expert's own
orders, so 9 of 49 imported experts showed a different figure.

- Order.salesAgentId (+ referrerCustomerId for 17 legacy orders whose
  referrer was not an expert); additive migration, recent app orders
  backfilled from the customer's referrer
- createOrder records the expert at placement time
- one shared filter (agent-orders.ts) for the experts list, expert
  detail, dashboard and the expert app; child orders follow salesAgentId
- customer page gets its «میزان فروش» back
- import carries orders.reagent_id as is; ex-experts kept as admins keep
  their profile so their own orders stay linked
- reconcile-sales: 1,557 of 1,558 match legacy's own formula; balances
  unchanged

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 10:40:21 +03:30