The reference texted three audiences on every placed order
(henza_server Api/ApiMobileController::setOrder:733-766). None of it was
wired here — OrdersService had no SmsService at all, so a customer could
place an order and nobody was told: not the customer, not the admins, not
the referring sales expert.
Now, after the transaction commits (so a rolled-back order texts nobody)
and without ever being awaited (D20 — a dead gateway must not fail an
order):
- every mobile in ORDER_ADMIN_MOBILES, with the customer's name and
the rounded gold weight;
- the customer, with distinct text for a normal and an over-limit
suspended order;
- the referring sales expert, looked up on AdminUser (the target's
referring expert is an admin, not a customer as in the reference).
The reference's four hardcoded personal numbers stay out of git, behind
the same env-var pattern as PROFILE_ADMIN_MOBILES.
The «در سیستم ویرایش شد» variant was deliberately not ported: the target
has no order-edit route, so it would be dead code — «عمداً تکرار نشد».
Also fills §2 of the admin matrix, the D1 deliverable that had been
(pending) since the phase opened: 163 rid-guarded routes, 68 distinct
rids, 176 grantable tree keys, and a per-module map to the reference
controllers. Only two enforced rids are ungrantable from the permission
screen (newsletters, persons.list.sellers.view) — filed as PERM-02,
awaiting an owner ruling because it changes the permission vocabulary.
Phase 1 (admin parity) is at its gate. api: 283/283 tests, 26 suites.
پنل: پیامک ثبت سفارش برای مشتری، ادمینها و کارشناس فروش فعال شد.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Finished from a parallel session that expired (owner: «بساز»).
- RPT-01: GET admin/report/order-items — legacy report/order_item's
32-column Excel (order items, one row per unit, plus financial
documents), RTL, Jalali dates. The «گزارش تجمیعی» screen gets
«دریافت فایل اکسل». Review fixes:
- weight: computedWeightGrams is already one unit's weight; legacy
divided it by qty again, under-reporting «بدهکار» on multi-unit
lines. Not repeated.
- «درصد»: the final percent (wage − discount), as legacy.
- dates: the end date covers its whole day; a bad date is a 400.
- SMS-01: confirming or rejecting a financial document texts the customer,
as legacy CashController::toggleConfiremCash.
- SMS-02: bulk SMS substitutes %name per recipient and is actually sent
through the configured gateway (D26 relay), no longer only logged.
- Docs: 01-ADMIN-MATRIX and D16-BC-GAP-SUMMARY.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Owner ruling: computing and displaying price / price_with_discount is retail
storefront work, so it falls under D13 and is marked out of scope. The B2B
app works in making charge only.
variant-price.ts and its 11 hand-checked tests are kept and still run, just
unused. Nothing needed reverting: computeVariantPrice was never called from
outside its own file and spec, verified by grep over apps/api/src and
apps/admin-panel/src, so no price had been wired into any screen. PRICE-01
is re-marked in ISSUES.md rather than deleted so the evidence survives if
the storefront is ever taken up.
Making-charge work stays fully in scope: percentage_pay,
makingChargeOffsetPercent, and wage display on variants and order lines.
New Phase 1 order: Persons -> products/categories/variants/order detail ->
financial documents -> users and permissions -> admin SMS -> promotions,
notifications, cities, branches, workshops -> reports -> gate. Per section:
implement the gaps, then field-by-field test that section, and show a gap
summary before fixing.
SEC-02 re-verified live rather than quoted: 9/9 assertions, plus 32/32 in
auth-smoke.sh. POST /orders is 401 without a token; a body customerId of
"customer-2" sent with a customer-dev-test token still lands the order on
customer-dev-test and is warn-logged; a foreign order id returns 404 rather
than 403 so ids stay unenumerable; the admin read rejects a customer token.
Client-supplied wagePercent/discountPercent/flatRialCharge remain as MON-08,
already scheduled as Phase 2 item #1.
Also records why the dev OTP log briefly looked broken: a stale API process
still held port 3077, so the new instance died with EADDRINUSE and the
tailed log belonged to the old process. Not a regression.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Answers D1's 172-vs-174 question with real counts: the catalogues hold 176
(reference) and 174 (target) unique keys, and the ENTIRE difference is the
dashboard. The reference has `dashboard` + `dashboard.omde` + `dashboard.tak`;
the target replaces all three with `dashboard.view`, because the admin
Dashboard is a PROTECTED zone that merged the two reference dashboards.
176 - 3 + 1 = 174. All 173 other keys match exactly, including the same 5
keys that legitimately appear twice in the tree.
Route-guard rids are 57 vs 57, differing only by that dashboard
consolidation plus one target-only route reusing an existing catalogue rid.
All 67 reachable reference admin routes exist in the target at the same
paths; 2 target-only routes are additive.
Three findings logged:
PRICE-01 (critical) — no product price is computed or shown anywhere in the
admin panel. The reference appends price/price_with_discount to every
variant and renders it in three places in its product list; the target's
variantRow() returns neither, nothing fetches a gold rate for the admin
list, and computeVariantPrice() — ported and unit-tested earlier today — is
called from nowhere. This is fix#1.
PERM-01 (medium) — dashboard.omde and dashboard.tak are seeded into the
permission table but absent from the permission UI, so they are grantable
yet unmanageable; the DB holds 178 distinct rids against the UI's 174. The
fix deletes permission rows, so it waits for the owner's approval.
PRICE-02 (info) — rial_pay belongs only to the superseded commented-out
formula; the target correctly omits it. Recorded so it is not "restored".
Contrary to the Phase 0 expectation, the order module is in good shape: the
gram_level credit limit matches the reference exactly including the strict
'>' comparison, and debt recognition fires at the same status.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
