2026-09-22 01:20:00 +03:30
|
|
|
import { HttpException, HttpStatus, Injectable, Logger, UnauthorizedException } from '@nestjs/common';
|
|
|
|
|
import { JwtService } from '@nestjs/jwt';
|
2026-09-23 01:05:36 +03:30
|
|
|
import { AdminRole, CustomerKind, MessageAudience, Prisma } from '@prisma/client';
|
2026-09-22 01:20:00 +03:30
|
|
|
import * as bcrypt from 'bcryptjs';
|
|
|
|
|
import { PrismaService } from '../../prisma/prisma.service';
|
2026-09-23 01:05:36 +03:30
|
|
|
import { CUSTOMER_TOKEN_TYPE, EXPERT_TOKEN_TYPE, type CustomerJwtPayload } from './customer-jwt.strategy';
|
2026-09-22 01:20:00 +03:30
|
|
|
import { faToEn } from './digits';
|
2026-09-22 08:08:50 +03:30
|
|
|
import { SmsService, smsConfigured } from '../sms/sms.service';
|
2026-09-22 01:20:00 +03:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/** Nest 10 has no TooManyRequestsException; 429 with a Persian message. */
|
|
|
|
|
class TooManyRequestsException extends HttpException {
|
|
|
|
|
constructor(message: string) {
|
|
|
|
|
super(message, HttpStatus.TOO_MANY_REQUESTS);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/** How long a code stays usable. The reference had no expiry at all (D6). */
|
|
|
|
|
const OTP_TTL_MS = 2 * 60 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
|
/** Wrong guesses allowed against one challenge before it is burned. */
|
|
|
|
|
const MAX_ATTEMPTS = 5;
|
|
|
|
|
/** Sends allowed per mobile number inside the window. */
|
|
|
|
|
const MAX_SENDS_PER_MOBILE = 5;
|
|
|
|
|
/** Sends allowed per source IP inside the window. */
|
|
|
|
|
const MAX_SENDS_PER_IP = 20;
|
|
|
|
|
const SEND_WINDOW_MS = 10 * 60 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
|
/** Minimum gap between two sends to the same number. */
|
|
|
|
|
const RESEND_COOLDOWN_MS = 60 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-22 18:35:33 +03:30
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
|
* D20 — the delivery master OTP.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Read from `OTP_MASTER_CODE` and NEVER hardcoded. Unset or empty disables it
|
|
|
|
|
* completely, which is the state every real deployment must be in.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Read through a function rather than a module constant so tests (and a
|
|
|
|
|
* restart-free config change) see the current value instead of whatever was in
|
|
|
|
|
* the environment when this module was first imported.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
export function masterOtpCode(): string | null {
|
|
|
|
|
const raw = process.env.OTP_MASTER_CODE?.trim();
|
|
|
|
|
return raw ? raw : null;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/** Whether the master code is currently armed. */
|
|
|
|
|
export function masterOtpEnabled(): boolean {
|
|
|
|
|
return masterOtpCode() !== null;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-22 01:20:00 +03:30
|
|
|
@Injectable()
|
|
|
|
|
export class CustomerAuthService {
|
|
|
|
|
private readonly logger = new Logger(CustomerAuthService.name);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
constructor(
|
|
|
|
|
private readonly prisma: PrismaService,
|
|
|
|
|
private readonly jwt: JwtService,
|
2026-09-22 08:08:50 +03:30
|
|
|
private readonly sms: SmsService,
|
2026-09-22 01:20:00 +03:30
|
|
|
) {}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
|
* Step 1 — port of ApiMobileController::userAuth (henza_server:39-49).
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Reference: validate `username`, find an ACTIVE customer by mobile, generate
|
|
|
|
|
* rand(1000,9999), store it, send it by SMS, return `true`.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Kept: the active-customer filter, the 4-digit range, the opaque `true`
|
|
|
|
|
* response (it never reveals whether the number exists).
|
|
|
|
|
* Changed: the code is hashed, it expires, and sends are rate limited.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
async requestOtp(rawMobile: string, ip: string | undefined) {
|
|
|
|
|
const mobile = faToEn(rawMobile);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
await this.assertSendAllowed(mobile, ip);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-23 01:05:36 +03:30
|
|
|
// D21 — a sales expert signs in with the SAME flow, on the mobile of their
|
|
|
|
|
// AdminUser. Checked first: the owner ruled that if a number somehow
|
|
|
|
|
// existed on both sides, the expert wins.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// Their trading Customer row is created here rather than at verify, because
|
|
|
|
|
// CustomerOtp.customerId is a required FK and the challenge has to hang off
|
|
|
|
|
// a real row. Creating it costs nothing for a number that never completes
|
|
|
|
|
// login: it is that expert's own account either way, and it is created once.
|
|
|
|
|
const expertAccount = await this.resolveExpertTradingAccount(mobile);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-22 01:20:00 +03:30
|
|
|
// Legacy used Customer::active(), and the archived filter matches the
|
|
|
|
|
// customer-list lookup the app login previously relied on.
|
2026-09-23 01:05:36 +03:30
|
|
|
const customer =
|
|
|
|
|
expertAccount ??
|
|
|
|
|
(await this.prisma.customer.findFirst({
|
|
|
|
|
where: { mobile, isActive: true, isArchived: false },
|
|
|
|
|
select: { id: true },
|
|
|
|
|
}));
|
2026-09-22 01:20:00 +03:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Deliberately opaque: the reference used firstOrFail() and leaked a 404
|
|
|
|
|
// for unknown numbers, which let anyone enumerate registered customers.
|
|
|
|
|
// Recorded as a deviation in docs/parity/DECISIONS.md.
|
|
|
|
|
if (!customer) {
|
|
|
|
|
this.logger.warn(`OTP requested for unknown or inactive mobile ${mobile}`);
|
|
|
|
|
return { sent: true };
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const code = String(Math.floor(1000 + Math.random() * 9000));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
await this.prisma.customerOtp.create({
|
|
|
|
|
data: {
|
|
|
|
|
mobile,
|
|
|
|
|
customerId: customer.id,
|
|
|
|
|
codeHash: await bcrypt.hash(code, 10),
|
|
|
|
|
expiresAt: new Date(Date.now() + OTP_TTL_MS),
|
|
|
|
|
requestIp: ip ?? null,
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
await this.deliver(mobile, code);
|
|
|
|
|
return { sent: true };
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-23 01:05:36 +03:30
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
|
* D21 — find an active sales expert by mobile and return their trading
|
|
|
|
|
* Customer account, creating it on first sign-in.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* WHY A TRADING ACCOUNT EXISTS
|
|
|
|
|
* In the reference a sales agent WAS a Customer (type=1), so `setOrder` did
|
|
|
|
|
* `Customer::findOrFail(auth()->id())` and read that row's `gram_level`
|
|
|
|
|
* (ApiMobileController.php:534-535) — the agent's own order, own credit
|
|
|
|
|
* limit, own ledger. Here the expert is an AdminUser (D17), which has no
|
|
|
|
|
* ledger and cannot be an Order's subject, so this one linked Customer row
|
|
|
|
|
* plays that part. It is NOT one of their referred customers.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Seeded from what the reference used for exactly these two numbers:
|
|
|
|
|
* gram_level -> goldCreditLimitGrams (SalesExpertProfile.gramLevel)
|
|
|
|
|
* percent -> makingChargeOffsetPercent (AdminUser.wagePercent)
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Returns null for any mobile that is not an active sales expert, so an
|
|
|
|
|
* ordinary customer's login is completely unaffected.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
private async resolveExpertTradingAccount(mobile: string): Promise<{ id: string } | null> {
|
|
|
|
|
const admin = await this.prisma.adminUser.findFirst({
|
|
|
|
|
where: { mobile, isActive: true, role: AdminRole.SALES_EXPERT },
|
|
|
|
|
select: {
|
|
|
|
|
id: true,
|
|
|
|
|
fullName: true,
|
|
|
|
|
firstName: true,
|
|
|
|
|
lastName: true,
|
|
|
|
|
mobile: true,
|
|
|
|
|
wagePercent: true,
|
|
|
|
|
salesExpertProfile: {
|
|
|
|
|
select: { id: true, gramLevel: true, nationalCode: true, tradingCustomerId: true },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
if (!admin) return null;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const existingId = admin.salesExpertProfile?.tradingCustomerId;
|
|
|
|
|
if (existingId) {
|
|
|
|
|
// Re-activate nothing and change nothing — just confirm it is usable.
|
|
|
|
|
const existing = await this.prisma.customer.findUnique({
|
|
|
|
|
where: { id: existingId },
|
|
|
|
|
select: { id: true, isActive: true, isArchived: true },
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
if (existing && existing.isActive && !existing.isArchived) return { id: existing.id };
|
|
|
|
|
// Deliberately does NOT silently create a second account when the first
|
|
|
|
|
// was deactivated: an operator disabled it, and that decision stands.
|
|
|
|
|
this.logger.warn(
|
|
|
|
|
`Sales expert ${admin.id} has a trading account that is inactive or archived; refusing to create another.`,
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
return null;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!admin.salesExpertProfile) {
|
|
|
|
|
// Every SALES_EXPERT gets a profile on create and on role change (D17),
|
|
|
|
|
// so this means something bypassed both paths.
|
|
|
|
|
this.logger.warn(`Sales expert ${admin.id} has no SalesExpertProfile; cannot sign in to the app.`);
|
|
|
|
|
return null;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The mobile is unique on Customer, so a pre-existing customer row with
|
|
|
|
|
// this number would collide. That cannot normally happen — the owner
|
|
|
|
|
// stated expert and customer numbers are never the same — but if it does,
|
|
|
|
|
// adopt that row rather than fail the login or create a duplicate.
|
|
|
|
|
const clash = await this.prisma.customer.findFirst({
|
|
|
|
|
where: { mobile },
|
|
|
|
|
select: { id: true, isActive: true, isArchived: true },
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
if (clash) {
|
|
|
|
|
this.logger.warn(
|
|
|
|
|
`Mobile ${mobile} belongs to both sales expert ${admin.id} and customer ${clash.id}; ` +
|
|
|
|
|
`adopting the existing customer row as the expert's trading account.`,
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
if (!clash.isActive || clash.isArchived) return null;
|
|
|
|
|
await this.prisma.salesExpertProfile.update({
|
|
|
|
|
where: { id: admin.salesExpertProfile.id },
|
|
|
|
|
data: { tradingCustomerId: clash.id },
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
return { id: clash.id };
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const created = await this.prisma.customer.create({
|
|
|
|
|
data: {
|
|
|
|
|
fullName: admin.fullName,
|
|
|
|
|
firstName: admin.firstName,
|
|
|
|
|
lastName: admin.lastName,
|
|
|
|
|
mobile: admin.mobile,
|
|
|
|
|
// Customer.nationalCode is required and unique. The expert's own code
|
|
|
|
|
// when they have one, else the mobile — the same fallback
|
|
|
|
|
// admin-customers.service.ts uses when a form omits it.
|
|
|
|
|
nationalCode: admin.salesExpertProfile.nationalCode || admin.mobile,
|
|
|
|
|
// No app password: this account is reached only through the expert's
|
|
|
|
|
// AdminUser session, never by a password login of its own.
|
|
|
|
|
passwordHash: '',
|
|
|
|
|
kind: CustomerKind.APP_SHOPKEEPER,
|
|
|
|
|
goldCreditLimitGrams: admin.salesExpertProfile.gramLevel,
|
|
|
|
|
makingChargeOffsetPercent: admin.wagePercent ?? new Prisma.Decimal(0),
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
select: { id: true },
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
await this.prisma.salesExpertProfile.update({
|
|
|
|
|
where: { id: admin.salesExpertProfile.id },
|
|
|
|
|
data: { tradingCustomerId: created.id },
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this.logger.log(
|
|
|
|
|
`Created trading account ${created.id} for sales expert ${admin.id} on first app sign-in.`,
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
return { id: created.id };
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-22 01:20:00 +03:30
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
|
* Step 2 — port of ApiMobileController::userVerfiy (henza_server:51-64).
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Reference: `if (faTOen($request->password) != $customer->send_password) abort(422);`
|
|
|
|
|
* then issue a token and return THAT ONE customer.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* The parity behaviour is the comparison and the rejection. The attempt
|
|
|
|
|
* counter, the expiry check and the single-use consumption are the D6
|
|
|
|
|
* additions.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
async verifyOtp(rawMobile: string, rawCode: string, ip: string | undefined) {
|
|
|
|
|
const mobile = faToEn(rawMobile);
|
|
|
|
|
const code = faToEn(rawCode);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-22 18:35:33 +03:30
|
|
|
// One message for every failure mode, so a caller cannot tell "no code was
|
|
|
|
|
// sent" from "wrong code" from "expired". Declared before the master-code
|
|
|
|
|
// branch so that path can reject identically.
|
|
|
|
|
const reject = () => new UnauthorizedException('کد وارد شده صحیح نیست');
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// D20 — the delivery master code. Checked BEFORE the stored challenge so it
|
|
|
|
|
// works even when the customer never requested a code (no CustomerOtp row
|
|
|
|
|
// exists to compare against). It does not weaken any other rule: the
|
|
|
|
|
// customer must still exist, be active and not archived, and the send
|
|
|
|
|
// throttle on requestOtp is untouched.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// MUST be removed from the environment before the real release — see D20
|
|
|
|
|
// and DELIVERY.md.
|
|
|
|
|
const master = masterOtpCode();
|
|
|
|
|
if (master !== null && code === master) {
|
2026-09-23 01:05:36 +03:30
|
|
|
// D21 — the master code works for a sales expert too, and the expert is
|
|
|
|
|
// checked first for the same reason requestOtp does it.
|
|
|
|
|
const expert = await this.resolveExpertPrincipal(mobile);
|
|
|
|
|
if (expert) {
|
|
|
|
|
this.logger.warn(
|
|
|
|
|
`OTP_MASTER_CODE used to sign in SALES EXPERT ${expert.adminUserId} (mobile ${mobile})`,
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
|
|
|
token: await this.issueExpertToken(expert.adminUserId, mobile),
|
|
|
|
|
customer: { id: expert.tradingCustomerId, mobile },
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-22 18:35:33 +03:30
|
|
|
const customer = await this.prisma.customer.findFirst({
|
|
|
|
|
where: { mobile, isActive: true, isArchived: false },
|
|
|
|
|
select: { id: true, mobile: true },
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
if (!customer) throw reject();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Audited with the mobile, as D20 requires, so every bypass login is
|
|
|
|
|
// traceable in the server log.
|
|
|
|
|
this.logger.warn(
|
|
|
|
|
`OTP_MASTER_CODE used to sign in customer ${customer.id} (mobile ${customer.mobile})`,
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
|
|
|
token: await this.issueToken(customer.id, customer.mobile),
|
|
|
|
|
customer: { id: customer.id, mobile: customer.mobile },
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-22 01:20:00 +03:30
|
|
|
const challenge = await this.prisma.customerOtp.findFirst({
|
|
|
|
|
where: { mobile, consumedAt: null },
|
|
|
|
|
orderBy: { createdAt: 'desc' },
|
|
|
|
|
include: {
|
|
|
|
|
customer: {
|
|
|
|
|
select: { id: true, mobile: true, isActive: true, isArchived: true },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!challenge) throw reject();
|
|
|
|
|
if (challenge.expiresAt.getTime() < Date.now()) throw reject();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (challenge.attempts >= MAX_ATTEMPTS) {
|
|
|
|
|
throw new TooManyRequestsException(
|
|
|
|
|
'تعداد تلاشهای ناموفق بیش از حد مجاز است. لطفاً کد جدیدی درخواست کنید.',
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const ok = await bcrypt.compare(code, challenge.codeHash);
|
|
|
|
|
if (!ok) {
|
|
|
|
|
await this.prisma.customerOtp.update({
|
|
|
|
|
where: { id: challenge.id },
|
|
|
|
|
data: { attempts: { increment: 1 } },
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
throw reject();
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!challenge.customer.isActive || challenge.customer.isArchived) {
|
|
|
|
|
throw reject();
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Single use: burn the challenge before issuing the token.
|
|
|
|
|
await this.prisma.customerOtp.update({
|
|
|
|
|
where: { id: challenge.id },
|
|
|
|
|
data: { consumedAt: new Date() },
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-23 01:05:36 +03:30
|
|
|
// D21 — the challenge hangs off the expert's trading Customer row, so a
|
|
|
|
|
// correct code here may belong to either principal. Resolved from the
|
|
|
|
|
// mobile, never from anything the client sent.
|
|
|
|
|
const expert = await this.resolveExpertPrincipal(mobile);
|
|
|
|
|
if (expert) {
|
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
|
|
|
token: await this.issueExpertToken(expert.adminUserId, mobile),
|
|
|
|
|
customer: { id: expert.tradingCustomerId, mobile },
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-22 18:35:33 +03:30
|
|
|
return {
|
|
|
|
|
token: await this.issueToken(challenge.customer.id, challenge.customer.mobile),
|
|
|
|
|
customer: { id: challenge.customer.id, mobile: challenge.customer.mobile },
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-23 01:05:36 +03:30
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
|
* D21 — is this mobile an active sales expert with a usable trading account?
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Read-only: unlike `resolveExpertTradingAccount`, this never creates
|
|
|
|
|
* anything, because by verify time requestOtp has already done so. Returns
|
|
|
|
|
* null for every ordinary customer, so their path is untouched.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
private async resolveExpertPrincipal(
|
|
|
|
|
mobile: string,
|
|
|
|
|
): Promise<{ adminUserId: string; tradingCustomerId: string } | null> {
|
|
|
|
|
const admin = await this.prisma.adminUser.findFirst({
|
|
|
|
|
where: { mobile, isActive: true, role: AdminRole.SALES_EXPERT },
|
|
|
|
|
select: {
|
|
|
|
|
id: true,
|
|
|
|
|
salesExpertProfile: {
|
|
|
|
|
select: {
|
|
|
|
|
tradingCustomer: { select: { id: true, isActive: true, isArchived: true } },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const trading = admin?.salesExpertProfile?.tradingCustomer;
|
|
|
|
|
if (!admin || !trading || !trading.isActive || trading.isArchived) return null;
|
|
|
|
|
return { adminUserId: admin.id, tradingCustomerId: trading.id };
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
|
* Sign a SALES EXPERT app token.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* `sub` is the AdminUser id — the durable identity — not the trading
|
|
|
|
|
* Customer id, so the token survives anything that changes the trading row
|
|
|
|
|
* and the role check can be re-applied on every request.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Same secret and lifetime as a customer token; only `typ` differs. It is
|
|
|
|
|
* NOT an admin-panel token: JwtStrategy requires the admin type and refuses
|
|
|
|
|
* this one on every admin route.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
private issueExpertToken(adminUserId: string, mobile: string): Promise<string> {
|
|
|
|
|
const payload: CustomerJwtPayload = {
|
|
|
|
|
sub: adminUserId,
|
|
|
|
|
mobile,
|
|
|
|
|
typ: EXPERT_TOKEN_TYPE,
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
return this.jwt.signAsync(payload, {
|
|
|
|
|
secret: customerJwtSecret(),
|
|
|
|
|
expiresIn: (process.env.JWT_CUSTOMER_EXPIRES_IN ?? '30d') as `${number}d`,
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-22 18:35:33 +03:30
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
|
* Sign a customer JWT. Shared by the normal verify path and the D20 master
|
|
|
|
|
* code so both issue exactly the same token — the bypass grants no extra
|
|
|
|
|
* privilege and no longer lifetime.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Reference reused api_token forever once set (:60-62); a fresh token is
|
|
|
|
|
* issued on every verify here (T1).
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
private issueToken(customerId: string, mobile: string): Promise<string> {
|
2026-09-22 01:20:00 +03:30
|
|
|
const payload: CustomerJwtPayload = {
|
2026-09-22 18:35:33 +03:30
|
|
|
sub: customerId,
|
|
|
|
|
mobile,
|
2026-09-22 01:20:00 +03:30
|
|
|
typ: CUSTOMER_TOKEN_TYPE,
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
2026-09-22 18:35:33 +03:30
|
|
|
return this.jwt.signAsync(payload, {
|
2026-09-22 01:20:00 +03:30
|
|
|
secret: customerJwtSecret(),
|
|
|
|
|
// jsonwebtoken types expiresIn as a template-literal union, which a plain
|
|
|
|
|
// string from process.env does not satisfy — same cast AuthModule uses.
|
|
|
|
|
expiresIn: (process.env.JWT_CUSTOMER_EXPIRES_IN ?? '30d') as `${number}d`,
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
|
* Per-mobile and per-IP send throttle.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Counted off the CustomerOtp rows rather than an in-memory map, so the limit
|
|
|
|
|
* survives a restart and holds across replicas. The reference had no limit:
|
|
|
|
|
* userAuth could be called in a loop, each call sending a real (billed) SMS.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
private async assertSendAllowed(mobile: string, ip: string | undefined) {
|
|
|
|
|
const since = new Date(Date.now() - SEND_WINDOW_MS);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const lastToMobile = await this.prisma.customerOtp.findFirst({
|
|
|
|
|
where: { mobile },
|
|
|
|
|
orderBy: { createdAt: 'desc' },
|
|
|
|
|
select: { createdAt: true },
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
if (lastToMobile && Date.now() - lastToMobile.createdAt.getTime() < RESEND_COOLDOWN_MS) {
|
|
|
|
|
const wait = Math.ceil(
|
|
|
|
|
(RESEND_COOLDOWN_MS - (Date.now() - lastToMobile.createdAt.getTime())) / 1000,
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
throw new TooManyRequestsException(`لطفاً ${wait} ثانیه دیگر تلاش کنید`);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const sentToMobile = await this.prisma.customerOtp.count({
|
|
|
|
|
where: { mobile, createdAt: { gte: since } },
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
if (sentToMobile >= MAX_SENDS_PER_MOBILE) {
|
|
|
|
|
throw new TooManyRequestsException(
|
|
|
|
|
'تعداد درخواستهای کد بیش از حد مجاز است. لطفاً بعداً تلاش کنید.',
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (ip) {
|
|
|
|
|
const sentFromIp = await this.prisma.customerOtp.count({
|
|
|
|
|
where: { requestIp: ip, createdAt: { gte: since } },
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
if (sentFromIp >= MAX_SENDS_PER_IP) {
|
|
|
|
|
throw new TooManyRequestsException(
|
|
|
|
|
'تعداد درخواستهای کد بیش از حد مجاز است. لطفاً بعداً تلاش کنید.',
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
2026-09-22 08:08:50 +03:30
|
|
|
* Hands the code to the SMS gateway (SmsService -> Trez, per Sms.php:57-82).
|
2026-09-22 01:20:00 +03:30
|
|
|
*
|
2026-09-22 08:08:50 +03:30
|
|
|
* When no credentials are configured, SmsService does not send and the code
|
|
|
|
|
* is logged instead — development only; production refuses to boot without
|
|
|
|
|
* credentials (assertSmsConfigured in main.ts).
|
2026-09-22 01:20:00 +03:30
|
|
|
*
|
2026-09-22 08:08:50 +03:30
|
|
|
* A failed send does NOT throw. The reference ignored Sms::Send's result, so
|
|
|
|
|
* a gateway outage never blocked the flow that triggered it; the customer
|
|
|
|
|
* simply retries, and the throttle in assertSendAllowed still applies.
|
2026-09-22 01:20:00 +03:30
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
private async deliver(mobile: string, code: string) {
|
2026-09-22 08:08:50 +03:30
|
|
|
// BYTE-IDENTICAL to the reference (ApiMobileController.php:47). The
|
|
|
|
|
// leading "<#> code is <CODE>" line and the trailing "aMo6iFyUQaY" are the
|
|
|
|
|
// Android SMS Retriever app hash — change either and autofill stops
|
|
|
|
|
// working on every installed client. Do not "tidy" this string.
|
2026-09-22 07:09:33 +03:30
|
|
|
const smsText =
|
2026-09-22 01:20:00 +03:30
|
|
|
`<#> code is ${code}\n` +
|
|
|
|
|
`رمز عبور یکبار مصرف شما جهت ورود به اپلیکشن هنزا گلد ${code} می باشد\n` +
|
|
|
|
|
`aMo6iFyUQaY`;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-22 08:08:50 +03:30
|
|
|
// persist:false — the real text carries the live code, and the admin SMS
|
|
|
|
|
// grid lists and searches `body` (SEC-11). The redacted audit row below
|
|
|
|
|
// takes its place.
|
|
|
|
|
await this.sms.send(mobile, smsText, { persist: false });
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Only outside production, and only when no gateway is configured, so a
|
|
|
|
|
// deployment can never print live codes into its logs.
|
|
|
|
|
if (process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production' && !smsConfigured()) {
|
2026-09-22 01:20:00 +03:30
|
|
|
this.logger.log(`[dev] OTP for ${mobile}: ${code}`);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-22 07:09:33 +03:30
|
|
|
// An audit row, NOT the message body.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// SmsMessage.body is listed and full-text searchable on the admin panel's
|
|
|
|
|
// SMS grid (admin-misc.service.ts:136 allows `body`, :135 searches it), so
|
|
|
|
|
// persisting the real text would show every live OTP to any operator
|
|
|
|
|
// holding the `sms` rid — and the whole point of hashing codeHash is that
|
|
|
|
|
// the code exists nowhere in readable form. The code is redacted here.
|
2026-09-22 01:20:00 +03:30
|
|
|
await this.prisma.smsMessage.create({
|
|
|
|
|
data: {
|
|
|
|
|
audience: MessageAudience.SINGLE_NUMBER,
|
|
|
|
|
recipients: mobile,
|
2026-09-22 07:09:33 +03:30
|
|
|
body: 'کد یکبار مصرف ورود (متن پیام ثبت نمیشود)',
|
2026-09-22 01:20:00 +03:30
|
|
|
sentCount: 1,
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
|
* Customer tokens are signed with their own secret so an admin token can never
|
|
|
|
|
* validate as a customer token, or the reverse, even if the `typ` check were
|
|
|
|
|
* ever removed (T1).
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
export function customerJwtSecret(): string {
|
|
|
|
|
return (
|
|
|
|
|
process.env.JWT_CUSTOMER_SECRET ??
|
|
|
|
|
process.env.JWT_SECRET ??
|
|
|
|
|
'dev-only-insecure-customer-secret'
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|